English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Reply to Poeppl et al.: Controlling for false positive rates is critical for accurate and consistent interpretation of findings

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons238821

Mitricheva,  E
Research Group Neuronal Convergence, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons215826

Kimura,  R
Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84063

Logothetis,  NK
Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons214538

Noori,  HR
Research Group Neuronal Convergence, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Mitricheva, E., Kimura, R., Logothetis, N., & Noori, H. (2020). Reply to Poeppl et al.: Controlling for false positive rates is critical for accurate and consistent interpretation of findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(21), 11206. doi:10.1073/pnas.1916336117.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-56C5-B
Abstract
There is no abstract available