English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Asymptotic oscillations in the tracking behaviour of the fly Musca domestica

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84913

Poggio,  T
Former Department Information Processing in Insects, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Geiger, G., & Poggio, T. (1981). Asymptotic oscillations in the tracking behaviour of the fly Musca domestica. Biological Cybernetics, 41(3), 197-201. doi:10.1007/BF00340320.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-6C2F-E
Abstract
From recent theoretical work (Poggio and Reichardt, 1981), high frequency oscillations are expected in the angular trajectory of houseflies tracking a moving target if the target's retinal position controls the flight torque by means of a stronger optomotor response to progressive than to regressive motion. Experiments designed to test this conjecture have shown that (a) asymptotic non-decaying oscillations are found in the torque of female houseflies tracking targets moving at constant angular velocity; (b) the magnitude of the oscillations grows monotonically with mean retinal excentricity of the target; (c) the period of the oscillation is around 180–200 ms. The experimental findings are consistent with the hypothesis that a “progressive-regressive mechanism” plays a significant role in the tracking behaviour of female houseflies. From this phenomenological point of view a flicker mechanism that is active only for nonzero motion is equivalent to a progressive-regressive system. The relatively long period of the oscillation requires more complex reaction dynamics than a pure single dead-time delay. As a specific example we show that a model where the reaction to progressive motion is “sticky”, holding for a longish time after the ending of the stimulus, is consistent with the experimental data.