Scientific risk reporting in medical journals can bias expert judgment: 
Comparing surgeons’ risk comprehension across reporting formats

García-Retamero, Rocío; Petrova, Dafina; Cokely, Edward T.; Joeris, Alexander

doi:10.1037/xap0000242

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Please note that a newer version of this item is available:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_3239827_4

DetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Scientific risk reporting in medical journals can bias expert judgment: Comparing surgeons’ risk comprehension across reporting formats

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons139495

García-Retamero, Rocío
Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000242
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

García-Retamero, R., Petrova, D., Cokely, E. T., & Joeris, A. (2020). Scientific risk reporting in medical journals can bias expert judgment: Comparing surgeons’ risk comprehension across reporting formats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26(2), 283-299. doi:10.1037/xap0000242.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-9C0F-B

Abstract

There is no abstract available