English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse
  1. View item / 
  2. Item Summary

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Bed-Sharing in Couples Is Associated With Increased and Stabilized REM Sleep and Sleep-Stage Synchronization

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons187755

Wallot,  Sebastian
Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Drews, H., Wallot, S., Brysch, P., Berger-Johannsen, H., Mitkidis, P., Baier, P., et al. (2020). Bed-Sharing in Couples Is Associated With Increased and Stabilized REM Sleep and Sleep-Stage Synchronization. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11: 583. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00583.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-A7E5-B
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Sharing the bed with a partner is common among adults and


impacts sleep quality with potential implications for mental health. However, hitherto findings are contradictory and particularly polysomnographic data on co-sleeping couples are extremely rare. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of a bed partner's presence on individual and dyadic sleep neurophysiology.


Methods: Young healthy heterosexual couples underwent sleep-lab-based polysomnography of two sleeping arrangements: individual sleep and co-sleep. Individual and dyadic sleep parameters (i.e., synchronization of sleep stages) were collected. The latter were assessed using cross-recurrence quantification analysis.


Additionally, subjective sleep quality, relationship characteristics, and chronotype were monitored. Data were analyzed comparing co-sleep vs. individual sleep. Interaction effects of the sleeping arrangement with gender, chronotype, or relationship characteristics were moreover tested.


Results: As compared to sleeping individually, co-sleeping was associated with about


10% more REM sleep, less fragmented REM sleep (p = 0.008), longer undisturbed REM


fragments (p = 0.0006), and more limb movements (p = 0.007). None of the other Sleep stages was significantly altered. Social support interacted with sleeping arrangement in a way that individuals with suboptimal social support showed the biggest impact of the sleeping arrangement on REM sleep. Sleep architectures were more synchronized


between partners during co-sleep (p = 0.005) even if wake phases were excluded (p =


0.022). Moreover, sleep architectures are significantly coupled across a lag of ± 5min.


Depth of relationship represented an additional significant main effect regarding


synchronization, reflecting a positive association between the two. Neither REM sleep nor synchronization was influenced by gender, chronotype, or other relationship


characteristics.


Conclusion: Depending on the sleeping arrangement, couple's sleep architecture and


synchronization show alterations that are modified by relationship characteristics. We


discuss that these alterations could be part of a self-enhancing feedback loop of REM


sleep and sociality and a mechanism through which sociality prevents mental illness.