Compositional Inductive Biases in Function Learning

Schulz, E; Tenenbaum, JB; Duvenaud, D; Speekenbrink , M; Gershman, SJ

doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.002

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Compositional Inductive Biases in Function Learning

MPS-Authors

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available

External Resource

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028517301743
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Schulz, E., Tenenbaum, J., Duvenaud, D., Speekenbrink, M., & Gershman, S. (2017). Compositional Inductive Biases in Function Learning. Cognitive Neuroscience, 99, 44-79. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.002.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-B359-C

Abstract

How do people recognize and learn about complex functional structure? Taking inspiration from other areas of cognitive science, we propose that this is achieved by harnessing compositionality: complex structure is decomposed into simpler building blocks. We formalize this idea within the framework of Bayesian regression using a grammar over Gaussian process kernels, and compare this approach with other structure learning approaches. Participants consistently chose compositional (over non-compositional) extrapolations and interpolations of functions. Experiments designed to elicit priors over functional patterns revealed an inductive bias for compositional structure. Compositional functions were perceived as subjectively more predictable than non-compositional functions, and exhibited other signatures of predictability, such as enhanced memorability and reduced numerosity. Taken together, these results support the view that the human intuitive theory of functions is inherently compositional.