English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Capitalization and its Legal Friends

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons231620

Wansleben,  Leon
Soziologie öffentlicher Finanzen und Schulden, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (public)

AEL_11_2021_Wansleben.pdf
(Any fulltext), 362KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Wansleben, L. (2021). Capitalization and its Legal Friends. Accounting, Economics, and Law, 11(1), 53-64. doi:10.1515/ael-2020-0063.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-E1D8-8
Abstract
Katharina Pistor’s argument in The Code of Capital about the constitutive role of legal practice for the creation and distribution of wealth requires contextualization; her claims about the stand-alone role of law in determining the political economy of global capitalism are exaggerated. My first intervention concerns the concept of capital. Capital evidently is not just a legal code, but also constitutes a financial accounting entity that emerges from processes of investment, which are embedded in (economic, social, political) structures that are facilitative of unequal distributions of rewards and risks. Legal coding should be considered as part of such ‘capitalization’ and as becoming more critical in the contemporary economy, in which capitalization increasingly happens through financial engineering and through capturing rents from‘intangible capital’. Secondly, we can only understand the distributional implications of legal coding if we recognize a) the importance of rent-seeking in secularly stagnating economies and b) the particular class configurations in what Milanovic, B. (2019).Capitalism, alone. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press calls‘liberal meritocratic capitalism’. The consolidation of a capital-richandhard-working upper class in such a capitalist formation (the extreme case being United States) not just indicates a close alliance or overlap between holders of wealth and the professions (fund managers, legal advisers etc.) that serve them. It also indicates that social class structures–the paths of socialization they reproduce; their in-built social sorting mechanisms; their close association with ideologies of legitimate privilege–play a key role in reproducing economic distributional outcomes.