English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Supply Risk Considerations for the Elements in Nickel-Based Superalloys

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons21399

Bradshaw,  Alexander M.
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics;
NOMAD, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

resources-09-00106.pdf
(Publisher version), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Helbig, C., Bradshaw, A. M., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2020). Supply Risk Considerations for the Elements in Nickel-Based Superalloys. Resources, 9(9): 106. doi:10.3390/resources9090106.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-06A0-D
Abstract
Nickel-based superalloys contain various elements which are added in order to make the alloys more resistant to thermal and mechanical stress and to the adverse operating environments in jet engines. In particular, higher combustion temperatures in the gas turbine are important, since they result in higher fuel efficiency and thus in lower CO2 emissions. In this paper, a semi-quantitative assessment scheme is used to evaluate the relative supply risks associated with elements contained in various Ni-based superalloys: aluminium, titanium, chromium, iron, cobalt, niobium, molybdenum, ruthenium, tantalum, tungsten, and rhenium. Twelve indicators on the elemental level and four aggregation methods are applied in order to obtain the supply risk at the alloy level. The supply risks for the elements rhenium, molybdenum and cobalt are found to be the highest. For three of the aggregation schemes, the spread in supply risk values for the different alloy types (as characterized by chemical composition and the endurance temperature) is generally narrow. The fourth, namely the cost-share’ aggregation scheme, gives rise to a broader distribution of supply risk values. This is mainly due to the introduction of rhenium as a component starting with second-generation single crystal alloys. The resulting higher supply risk appears, however, to be acceptable for jet engine applications due to the higher temperatures these alloys can endure