English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Book Chapter

Appropriation of effective and changing things

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons207359

Stockhammer,  Philipp W.       
MHAAM, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society;
Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Stockhammer, P. W. (2019). Appropriation of effective and changing things. In L. Abu-Er-Rub, C. Brosius, S. Meurer, D. Panagiotopoulos, & S. Richter (Eds.), Engaging transculturality: concepts, key terms, case studies (pp. 264-276). Abington: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429430060-19.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-2F11-2
Abstract
In order to study transcultural dynamics in the prehistoric past, it is of great relevance to understand human–thing entanglements, as well as the power of things due to their ‘effectancy’ and ‘changeability(ies)’ – especially in the process of appropriation and connected transformation of objects and ideas. The differentiation of relational and material entanglement in these processes helps to better understand the transformative potential that results from the indivi-dual’s encounter with otherness. Within this process, the different changeability(ies) of a thing play a major role, which is significant for understanding a thing’s potential to stimulate human action, i.e. its effectancy, which I conceptualize as a counter-notion to human agency. On the basis of an archaeological case study from the second millennium BCE Southern Levant, I will then show the interrelation of appropriation, entanglement, changeability(ies) and effectancy as crucial factors for determining the complex relationship of humans and things. Finally, I will evaluate the epistemological potential of the concepts as well as their challenges and limitations.