English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Book Chapter

Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons72732

Haspelmath,  Martin
Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Haspelmath, M. (2018). Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), Grammaticalization from a typological perspective (pp. 97-115). Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1133896.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-91C2-9
Abstract
Grammaticalization is nowadays often seen primarily as a kind of semantic-pragmatic change, but in the 19th century it was more typically seen in a holistic typological pespective: The idea was that synthetic languages develop from analytic languages, and that they may become analytic again. This kind of development is indeed occasionally observed in entire languages, as in the Romance languages and in Later Egyptian, but it is quite unclear whether such holistic changes are at all common. Similarly, there seems to be no good evidence that changes from agglutinative patterns to isolating patterns go through an intermediate flective or fusional stage. By contrast, there is abundant evidence for the old observation that older tightly bound constructions often get competition from new constructions based on content items, which may eventually replace the older patterns (I call this kind of process anasynthesis). Such anasynthetic changes are driven by inflationary processes that can be observed elsewhere in language and culture, not by therapeutic motivations