Two Interconvertible Structures that Explain the Spectroscopic Properties of 
the Oxygen‐Evolving Complex of Photosystem II in the S2 State

Pantazis, Dimitrios A.; Ames, William; Cox, Nicholas; Lubitz, Wolfgang; Neese, Frank

doi:10.1002/anie.201204705

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

Two Interconvertible Structures that Explain the Spectroscopic Properties of the Oxygen‐Evolving Complex of Photosystem II in the S₂ State

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons216826

Pantazis, Dimitrios A.
Research Department Neese, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons237528

Ames, William
Research Department Neese, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons237557

Cox, Nicholas
Research Department Lubitz, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons237637

Lubitz, Wolfgang
Research Department Lubitz, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons216825

Neese, Frank
Research Department Neese, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

There are no locators available

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

公開されているフルテキストはありません

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Pantazis, D. A., Ames, W., Cox, N., Lubitz, W., & Neese, F. (2012). Two Interconvertible Structures that Explain the Spectroscopic Properties of the Oxygen‐Evolving Complex of Photosystem II in the S₂ State. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51(39), 9935-9940. doi:10.1002/anie.201204705.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-3FE8-E

要旨

Using models derived from the X‐ray structure of photosystem II, it is shown that the oxygen evolving complex in the S₂ state exists in two energetically similar and interconvertible forms. A longstanding question regarding the spectroscopy of the catalyst is thus answered: one form corresponds to the multiline g=2.0 EPR signal (see picture, right; O red, Mn purple, Ca yellow), and the other to the g≥4.1 signals (left).