English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

Cold cloud microphysical process rates in a global chemistry-climate model

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons193091

Bacer,  Sara
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons101104

Lelieveld,  Jos
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons101196

Pozzer,  Andrea
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Bacer, S., Sullivan, S. C., Tost, H., Lelieveld, J., & Pozzer, A. (2020). Cold cloud microphysical process rates in a global chemistry-climate model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 20. doi:10.5194/acp-2020-365.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-5CF3-0
Abstract
Microphysical processes in cold clouds which act as sources or sinks of hydrometeors below 0 °C control the ice crystal number concentrations (ICNCs) and in turn the cloud radiative effects. Estimating the relative importance of the cold cloud microphysical process rates is of fundamental importance to underpin the development of cloud parameterizations for weather, atmospheric chemistry and climate models and compare the output with observations at different temporal resolutions. This study quantifies and investigates the cold cloud microphysical process rates by means of the chemistry-climate model EMAC and defines the hierarchy of sources and sinks of ice crystals. The analysis is carried out both at global and at regional scales. We found that globally the freezing of cloud droplets, along with convective detrainment over tropical land masses, are the dominant sources of ice crystals, while aggregation and accretion act as the largest sinks. In general, all processes are characterised by highly skewed distribution. Moreover, the influence of (a) different ice nucleation parameterizations and (b) a future global warming scenario on the rates has been analysed in two sensitivity studies. In the first, we found that the application of different parameterizations for ice nucleation changed only slightly the hierarchy of ice crystal sources. In the second, all microphysical processes followed an upward shift (in altitude) and an increase by up to 10 % in the upper troposphere towards the end of the 21st century. This increase could have important feedbacks, such as leading to enhanced longwave warming of the uppermost atmosphere.