English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

Segregation in the atmospheric boundary layer: The case of OH – isoprene

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons144590

Tsokankunku,  Anywhere
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons100860

Bourtsoukidis,  Efstratios
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons101057

Kesselmeier,  Jürgen
Multiphase Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons230380

Marno,  Daniel
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons101122

Martinez,  Monica
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons101160

Nölscher,  Anke C.
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons127607

Ouwersloot,  Huug
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons207351

Pfannerstill,  Eva Y.
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons230525

Tauer,  Sebastian
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons101364

Williams,  Jonathan
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons186253

Yáñez-Serrano,  Ana Maria
Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons230413

Andreae,  Meinrat O.
Multiphase Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons100983

Harder,  Hartwig
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons211225

Sörgel,  Matthias
Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Dlugi, R., Berger, M., Mallik, C., Tsokankunku, A., Zelger, M., Acevedo, O. C., et al. (2019). Segregation in the atmospheric boundary layer: The case of OH – isoprene. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 19. doi:10.5194/acp-2018-1325.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-5E05-B
Abstract
In the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), incomplete mixing (i.e., segregation) results in reduced chemical reaction rates compared to those expected from mean values and rate constants derived under well mixed conditions. Recently, segregation has been suggested as a potential cause of discrepancies between modelled and measured OH radical concentrations, especially under high isoprene conditions. Therefore, the influence of segregation on the reaction of OH radicals with isoprene has been investigated by modelling studies and one ground-based and one aircraft campaign.

In this study, we measured isoprene and OH radicals with high time resolution in order to directly calculate the influence of segregation in a low-NOx and high-isoprene environment in the central Amazon basin. The calculated intensities of segregation (Is) at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) above canopy top are in the range of values determined at a temperate deciduous forest (ECHO-campaign) in a high-NOx low-isoprene environment, but stay below 10 %. To establish a more general idea about the causes of segregation and their potential limits, further analysis was based on the budget equations of isoprene mixing ratios, the variance of mixing ratios, and the balance of the intensity of segregation itself. Furthermore, it was investigated if a relation of Is to the turbulent isoprene surface flux can be established theoretically and empirically, as proposed previously. A direct relation is not given and the amount of variance in Is explained by the isoprene flux will be higher the less the influence from other processes (e.g., vertical advection) is and will therefore be greater near the surface. Although ground based values of Is from ATTO and ECHO are in the same range, we could identify different dominating processes driving Is. For ECHO the normalized variance of isoprene had the largest contribution, whereas for ATTO the different transport terms expressed as a residual were dominating. To get a more general picture of Is and its potential limits in the ABL, we also compared these ground based measurements to ABL modelling studies and results from an aircraft campaign. The ground based measurements show the lowest values of the degree of inhomogenous mixing (< 20 %, mostly below 10 %). These values increase if the contribution of lower frequencies is added. Values integrated over the whole boundary layer (modelling studies) are in the range from 10 % to 30 % and aircraft measurements integrating over different landscapes are amongst the largest reported. This presents evidence that larger scale heterogeneities in land surface properties contribute substantially to Is.