日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

Preprint

Assaying Large-scale Testing Models to InterpretCovid-19 Case Numbers: A Cross-country Study

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons75278

Besserve,  M
Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.01912
(全文テキスト(全般))

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Besserve, M., Buchholz, S., & Schölkopf, B. (submitted). Assaying Large-scale Testing Models to InterpretCovid-19 Case Numbers: A Cross-country Study.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-8AF5-9
要旨
Large-scale testing is considered key to assessing the state of the current COVID-19 pandemic, yet interpreting such data remains elusive. We modeled competing hypotheses regarding the underlying testing mechanisms, thereby providing different prevalence estimates based on case numbers, and used them to predict SARS-CoV-2-attributed death rate trajectories. Assuming that individuals were tested based solely on a predefined risk of being infectious implied the absolute case numbers reflected prevalence, but turned out to be a poor predictor. In contrast, models accounting for testing capacity, limiting the pool of tested individuals, performed better. This puts forward the percentage of positive tests as a robust indicator of epidemic dynamics in absence of country-specific information. We next demonstrated this strongly affects data interpretation. Notably absolute case numbers trajectories consistently overestimated growth rates at the beginning of two COVID-19 epidemic waves. Overall, this supports non-trivial testing mechanisms can be inferred from data and should be scrutinized.