English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Spin density and coenzyme M coordination geometry of the ox1 form of methyl-coenzyme M reductase: A pulse EPR study

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons254301

Goenrich,  M.
Department of Biochemistry, Alumni, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons254760

Thauer,  R. K.       
Department of Biochemistry, Alumni, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://doi.org/10.1021/ja053794w
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Harmer, J., Finazzo, C., Piskorski, R., Bauer, C., Jaun, B., Duin, E. C., et al. (2005). Spin density and coenzyme M coordination geometry of the ox1 form of methyl-coenzyme M reductase: A pulse EPR study. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127(50), 17744-17755. doi:10.1021/ja053794w.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-C7D5-8
Abstract
Methyl-coenzyme M reductase (MCR) catalyses the reduction of methyl-coenzyme M (CH3-S-CoM) with coenzyme B (H-S-CoB) to CH4 and CoM-S-S-CoB in methanogenic archaea. Here we present a pulse EPR study of the “ready” form MCRox1, providing a detailed description of the spin density and the coordination of coenzyme M (CoM) to the Ni cofactor F430. To achieve this, MCR was purified from cells grown in a 61Ni enriched medium and samples were prepared in D2O with the substrate analogue CoM either deuterated in the β-position or with 33S in the thiol group. To obtain the magnetic parameters ENDOR and HYSCORE measurements were done at X- and Q-band, and CW EPR, at X- and W-band. The hyperfine couplings of the β-protons of CoM indicate that the nickel to β-proton distances in MCRox1 are very similar to those in Ni(II)-MCRox1-silent, and thus the position of CoM relative to F430 is very similar in both species. Our thiolate sulfur and nickel EPR data prove a Ni−S coordination, with an unpaired spin density on the sulfur of 7 ± 3%. These results highlight the redox-active or noninnocent nature of the sulfur ligand on the oxidation state. Assuming that MCRox1 is oxidized relative to the Ni(II) species, the complex is formally best described as a Ni(III) (d7) thiolate in resonance with a thiyl radical/high-spin Ni(II) complex, NiIII− -SR ↔ NiII−•SR.