English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Predictive value of midsagittal tissue bridges on functional recovery after spinal cord injury

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons188373

Freund,  Patrick
Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland;
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, United Kingdom;
Department Neurophysics (Weiskopf), MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Pfyffer_2021.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Pfyffer, D., Vallotton, K., Curt, A., & Freund, P. (2021). Predictive value of midsagittal tissue bridges on functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 35(1), 33-43. doi:10.1177/1545968320971787.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0008-0C7B-2
Abstract
Background: The majority of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) have anatomically incomplete lesions and present with preserved tissue bridges, yet their outcomes vary.

Objective: To assess the predictive value of the anatomical location (ventral/dorsal) and width of preserved midsagittal tissue bridges for American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade conversion and SCI patient stratification into recovery-specific subgroups.

Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study includes 70 patients (56 men, age: 52.36 ± 18.58 years) with subacute (ie, 1 month) SCI (45 tetraplegics, 25 paraplegics), 1-month neuroimaging data, and 1-month and 12-month clinical data. One-month midsagittal T2-weighted scans were used to determine the location and width of tissue bridges. Their associations with functional outcomes were assessed using partial correlation and unbiased recursive partitioning conditional inference tree (URP-CTREE).

Results: Fifty-seven (81.4%) of 70 patients had tissue bridges (2.53 ± 2.04 mm) at 1-month post-SCI. Larger ventral (P = .001, r = 0.511) and dorsal (P < .001, r = 0.546) tissue bridges were associated with higher AIS conversion rates 12 months post-SCI (n = 39). URP-CTREE analysis identified 1-month ventral tissue bridges as predictors of 12-month total motor scores (0.4 mm cutoff, P = .008), recovery of upper extremity motor scores at 12 months (1.82 mm cutoff, P = .002), 12-month pin-prick scores (1.4 mm cutoff, P = .018), and dorsal tissue bridges at 1 month as predictors of 12-month Spinal Cord Independence Measure scores (0.5 mm cutoff, P = .003).

Conclusions: Midsagittal tissue bridges add predictive value to baseline clinical measures for post-SCI recovery. Based on tissue bridges' width, patients can be classified into subgroups of clinical recovery profiles. Midsagittal tissue bridges provide means to optimize patient stratification in clinical trials.