Refusal of European Arrest Warrants Due to Fair Trial Infringements : Review of 
the CJEU’s Judgment in “LM” by National Courts in Europe

Wahl, Thomas

doi:10.30709/eucrim-2020-026

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Refusal of European Arrest Warrants Due to Fair Trial Infringements : Review of the CJEU’s Judgment in “LM” by National Courts in Europe

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons212368

Wahl, Thomas
Public Law, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-026
(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Wahl, T. (2020). Refusal of European Arrest Warrants Due to Fair Trial Infringements: Review of the CJEU’s Judgment in “LM” by National Courts in Europe. Eucrim - the European Criminal Law Associations' Forum, (4), 321-330. doi:10.30709/eucrim-2020-026.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0008-4527-F

Abstract

One of the most controversially discussed and unresolved issues in extradition law, namely whether extradition can be denied because elements of a fair trial will not be ensured in the requesting (issuing) State, gained new momentum after the CJEU’s judgment in “LM” of 25 July 2018 (C-216/18 PPU). This judgment relates to the framework of the European Arrest Warrant – the surrender system established in the EU in 2002. After briefly classifying the problem doctrinally and discussing the approach taken by the ECtHR, the article explains the CJEU’s line of arguments in LM. The analysis focuses, in particular, on the necessary test phases that the executing judicial authority must carry out in order to find out possible fundamental rights breaches in the issuing EU Member State. The article then analyses the reviews of this judgment by national courts. The follow-up decision of the referring Irish court is compared with court decisions addressing, in detail, this specific problem of fair trial infringements in the United Kingdom, Germany, and the Netherlands. In doing so, the practical challenges that are encountered by the national courts in applying the CJEU’s required test are also identified.