English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

 
 
DownloadE-Mail

Released

Journal Article

Two sources of uncertainty independently modulate temporal expectancy

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons185784

Grabenhorst,  Matthias
Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons173724

Poeppel,  David
Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;
Department of Psychology, New York University,;
Max-Planck–NYU Center for Language, Music, and Emotion, New York University ;

/persons/resource/persons141631

Michalareas,  Giorgos
Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Grabenhorst, M., Maloney, L. T., Poeppel, D., & Michalareas, G. (2021). Two sources of uncertainty independently modulate temporal expectancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(16): e2019342118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2019342118.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0008-E1D8-6
Abstract
The environment is shaped by two sources of temporal uncertainty: the discrete probability of whether an event will occur and—if it does—the continuous probability of when it will happen. These two types of uncertainty are fundamental to every form of anticipatory behavior including learning, decision-making, and motor planning. It remains unknown how the brain models the two uncertainty parameters and how they interact in anticipation. It is commonly assumed that the discrete probability of whether an event will occur has a fixed effect on event expectancy over time. In contrast, we first demonstrate that this pattern is highly dynamic and monotonically increases across time. Intriguingly, this behavior is independent of the continuous probability of when an event will occur. The effect of this continuous probability on anticipation is commonly proposed to be driven by the hazard rate (HR) of events. We next show that the HR fails to account for behavior and propose a model of event expectancy based on the probability density function of events. Our results hold for both vision and audition, suggesting independence of the representation of the two uncertainties from sensory input modality. These findings enrich the understanding of fundamental anticipatory processes and have provocative implications for many aspects of behavior and its neural underpinnings.