日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Towards clinical application of prediction models for transition to psychosis: A systematic review and external validation study in the PRONIA sample

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons261980

Koutsouleris,  Nikolaos
Max Planck Fellow Group Precision Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Rosen, M., Betz, L. T., Schultze-Lutter, F., Chisholm, K., Haidl, T. K., Kambeitz-Ilankovic, L., Bertolino, A., Borgwardt, S., Brambilla, P., Lencer, R., Meisenzahl, E., Ruhrmann, S., Salokangas, R. K. R., Upthegrove, R., Wood, S. J., Koutsouleris, N., & Kambeitz, J. (2021). Towards clinical application of prediction models for transition to psychosis: A systematic review and external validation study in the PRONIA sample. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 125, 478-492. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.032.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0008-E5A3-D
要旨
A multitude of prediction models for a first psychotic episode in individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis have been proposed, but only rarely validated. We identified transition models based on clinical and neuropsychological data through a registered systematic literature search and evaluated their external validity in 173 CHRs from the Personalised Prognostic Tools for Early Psychosis Management (PRONIA) study. Discrimination performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and compared to the prediction of clinical raters. External discrimination performance varied considerably across the 22 identified models (AUC 0.40-0.76), with two models showing good discrimination performance. None of the tested models significantly outperformed clinical raters (AUC = 0.75). Combining predictions of clinical raters and the best model descriptively improved discrimination performance (AUC = 0.84). Results show that personalized prediction of transition in CHR is potentially feasible on a global scale. For implementation in clinical practice, further rounds of external validation, impact studies, and development of an ethical framework is necessary.