English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Weighing stars from birth to death: mass determination methods across the HRD

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons20165

Weiss,  Achim
Stellar Astrophysics, MPI for Astrophysics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons225758

Angelou,  George C.
Stellar Astrophysics, MPI for Astrophysics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons250998

Nsamba,  Benard
Stellar Evolution, Stellar Astrophysics, MPI for Astrophysics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Serenelli, A., Weiss, A., Aerts, C., Angelou, G. C., Baroch, D., Bastian, N., et al. (2021). Weighing stars from birth to death: mass determination methods across the HRD. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 29(1): 4. doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00132-9.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0008-F675-F
Abstract
The mass of a star is the most fundamental parameter for its structure, evolution, and final fate. It is particularly important for any kind of stellar archaeology and characterization of exoplanets. There exist a variety of methods in astronomy to estimate or determine it. In this review we present a significant number of such methods, beginning with the most direct and model-independent approach using detached eclipsing binaries. We then move to more indirect and model-dependent methods, such as the quite commonly used isochrone or stellar track fitting. The arrival of quantitative asteroseismology has opened a completely new approach to determine stellar masses and to complement and improve the accuracy of other methods. We include methods for different evolutionary stages, from the pre-main sequence to evolved (super)giants and final remnants. For all methods uncertainties and restrictions will be discussed. We provide lists of altogether more than 200 benchmark stars with relative mass accuracies between [0.3,2]% for the covered mass range of M∈[0.1,16]M, 75% of which are stars burning hydrogen in their core and the other 25% covering all other evolved stages. We close with a recommendation how to combine various methods to arrive at a “mass-ladder” for stars.