Cortical and subcortical contributions to interference resolution and 
inhibition: An fMRI ALE meta-analysis

Isherwood, S. J. S.; Keuken, M. C.; Bazin, Pierre-Louis; Forstmann, B. U.

doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.021

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

Cortical and subcortical contributions to interference resolution and inhibition: An fMRI ALE meta-analysis

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons23475

Bazin, Pierre-Louis
Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit (IMCN), University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands;
Department Neurophysics (Weiskopf), MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

There are no locators available

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

Isherwood_Keuken_2021.pdf
(出版社版), 6MB

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Isherwood, S. J. S., Keuken, M. C., Bazin, P.-L., & Forstmann, B. U. (2021). Cortical and subcortical contributions to interference resolution and inhibition: An fMRI ALE meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 129, 245-260. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.021.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0009-25E9-7

要旨

Interacting with our environment requires the selection of appropriate responses and the inhibition of others. Such effortful inhibition is achieved by a number of interference resolution and global inhibition processes. This meta-analysis including 57 studies and 73 contrasts revisits the overlap and differences in brain areas supporting interference resolution and global inhibition in cortical and subcortical brain areas. Activation likelihood estimation was used to discern the brain regions subserving each type of cognitive control. Individual contrast analysis revealed a common activation of the bilateral insula and supplementary motor areas. Subtraction analyses demonstrated the voxel-wise differences in recruitment in a number of areas including the precuneus in the interference tasks and the frontal pole and dorsal striatum in the inhibition tasks. Our results display a surprising lack of subcortical involvement within these types of cognitive control, a finding that is likely to reflect a systematic gap in the field of functional neuroimaging.