Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into 
interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize

Said, Nadia; Fischer, Helen; Anders, Gerrit

doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons255554

Fischer, Helen
Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

Said2022_Article_ContestedScienceIndividualsWit.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)

13423_2021_1993_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
(Supplementary material), 39KB

Citation

Said, N., Fischer, H., & Anders, G. (2022). Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 668-680. doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0009-7084-3

Abstract

There is no abstract available