English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Book Chapter

Evaluation tools in singing education: A comparison of human and technological measures

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons179725

Larrouy-Maestri,  Pauline
Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Larrouy-Maestri, P. (2020). Evaluation tools in singing education: A comparison of human and technological measures. In H. R. Gudmundsdottir, C. Beynon, K. M. Ludke, & A. J. Cohen (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to interdisciplinary studies in singing (Vol. 2: Education) (pp. 253-267). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315162607-21.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0009-D657-4
Abstract
Two methods are currently used to determine vocal performance intonation: human listeners and computer tools. Theoretically, evaluation relies on musical criteria and the more that performers sing in accordance to these criteria, the more accurate they are judged to be. In practice, evaluating music performances has to take into account several elements such as the type of performance, the musician, and the judge performing the evaluation. By discussing the advantages and limits of the two current methods in the general framework of evaluation of intonation, this chapter aims to provide practical information to make informed decisions when evaluating singing performances.