English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

The structure of Cu(110) (2×3)–N; pseudo‐square reconstruction of a rectangular mesh substrate

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons248624

Robinson,  Andrew W.
Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons248628

Somers,  Joseph S.
Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons248626

Ricken,  Detlef E.
Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21399

Bradshaw,  Alexander M.
Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

1.577475.pdf
(Publisher version), 850KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ashwin, M. J., Woodruff, D. P., Kilcoyne, A. L. D., Robinson, A. W., Somers, J. S., Ricken, D. E., et al. (1991). The structure of Cu(110) (2×3)–N; pseudo‐square reconstruction of a rectangular mesh substrate. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, 9(3), 1856-1860. doi:10.1116/1.577475.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0009-F5B3-8
Abstract
The structure of the Cu(110)(2×3)–N phase has been investigated by parallel studies using 3‐keV Li+ and 2‐keV He+ion scattering and scanned energy mode normal emission N 1s photoelectron diffraction. The Li+ion scattering results provide clear evidence for anadsorbate‐induced reconstruction of the Cu surface and, in particular, indicate a shortening of the Cu–Cu atomic spacing along the 〈100〉 azimuth to a value of 2.7±0.1 Å, similar to the 〈110〉 spacing of 2.55 Å. A model of the surface consistent with this result involves a pseudo‐square Cu top atom layer with N atoms occupying alternate hollow sites leading to a local structure which is a 6% distorted Cu(100)c(2×2)–N phase. He+ion scattering data provides support for the N hollow adsorption sites. Scanned energy mode photoelectron diffraction is insensitive to the nature of the reconstruction but provides information on the local adsorption sites and, hence, on the lateral registry of the reconstructed overlayer and the underlying substrate.