English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse
  1. View item / 
  2. Item Summary

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Cultural evolution of precise and agreed-upon semantic conventions in a multiplayer gaming app

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons189367

Morin,  Olivier
The Mint, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary results
(Supplementary material)

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

shh3147.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Morin, O., Müller, T. F., Morisseau, T., & Winters, J. (2022). Cultural evolution of precise and agreed-upon semantic conventions in a multiplayer gaming app. Cognitive Science, 46(2): e13113, pp. 1-26. doi:10.1111/cogs.13113.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-0F29-9
Abstract
The amount of information conveyed by linguistic conventions depends on their precision, yet the codes that humans and other animals use to communicate are quite ambiguous: they may map several vague meanings to the same symbol. How does semantic precision evolve, and what are the constraints that limit it? We address this question using a multiplayer gaming app, where individuals communicate with one another in a scaled-up referential game. Here, the goal is for a sender to use black and white symbols to communicate colors. We expected that the players’ mappings between symbols and colors would grow more specific over time, through a selection process whereby precise mappings are preferentially copied. We found that players become increasingly more precise in their use of symbols over the course of their interactions. This trend did not, however, result from selective copying of precise mappings. We explore the implications of this result for the study of lexical ambiguity, Zipf's Law of Meaning, and disagreements over semantic conventions.