English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

S-dual inflation and the String Swampland

MPS-Authors

Anchordoqui,  Luis A.
Max Planck Institute for Physics, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Antoniadis,  Ignatios
Max Planck Institute for Physics, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Lust,  Dieter
Max Planck Institute for Physics, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Soriano,  Jorge F.
Max Planck Institute for Physics, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Anchordoqui, L. A., Antoniadis, I., Lust, D., & Soriano, J. F. (2021). S-dual inflation and the String Swampland. Physical Review D, 103, 123537. Retrieved from https://publications.mppmu.mpg.de/?action=search&mpi=MPP-2021-30.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-1BA2-1
Abstract
The Swampland de Sitter conjecture in combination with upper limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r derived from observations of the cosmic microwave background endangers the paradigm of slow-roll single field inflation. This conjecture constrains the first and the second derivatives of the inflationary potential in terms of two (1) constants c and c′. In view of these restrictions we reexamine single-field inflationary potentials with S-duality symmetry, which ameliorate the unlikeliness problem of the initial condition. We compute r at next-to-leading order in slow-roll parameters for the most general form of S-dual potentials and confront model predictions to constraints imposed by the de Sitter conjecture. We find that c∼(10−1) and c′∼(10−2) can accommodate the 95\% CL upper limit on r. By imposing at least 50 e-folds of inflation with the effective field theory description only valid over a field displacement (1) when measured as a distance in the target space geometry, we further restrict c∼(10−2), while the constraint on c′ remains unchanged. We comment on how to accommodate the required small values of c and c′.