English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

Known unknowns: assessing the impact of instrumental calibration uncertainty on LISA science

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons238174

Gair,  Jonathan
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons252884

Speri,  Lorenzo
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

2204.13405.pdf
(Preprint), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Savalle, E., Gair, J., Speri, L., & Babak, S. (in preparation). Known unknowns: assessing the impact of instrumental calibration uncertainty on LISA science.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-6FD3-C
Abstract
The primary scientific results of the future space-based gravitational wave
interferometer LISA will come from the parameter inference of a large variety
of gravitational wave sources. However, the presence of calibration errors
could potentially degrade the measurement precision of the system parameters.
Here, we assess the impact of calibration uncertainties on parameter estimation
for individual sources, focusing on massive black holes, extreme-mass-ratio
inspirals (EMRIs), galactic binaries, and stellar origin black hole binaries.
Using a Fisher matrix formalism, we investigate how the measurement precision
of source parameters degrades as a function of the size of the assumed
calibration uncertainties. If we require that parameter measurements are
degraded by no more than a factor of two relative to their value in the absence
of calibration error, we find that calibration errors should be smaller than a
few tenths of a percent in amplitude and $10^{-3}$ in phase. We also
investigate the possibility of using verification binaries and EMRIs to
constrain calibration uncertainties. Verification binaries can constrain
amplitude calibration uncertainties at the level of a few percent, while both
source types can provide constrain phase calibration at the level of a
few$\times10^{-2}$.