English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Preprint

Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons192239

Gu,  Myojeong
Satellite Remote Sensing, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons101349

Wagner,  Thomas
Satellite Remote Sensing, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Pinardi, G., Roozendael, M. V., Hendrick, F., Richter, A., Valks, P., Alwarda, R., et al. (2021). Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, 14. doi:10.5194/amt-2021-356.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-7970-0
Abstract
This paper reports on ground-based validation of the atmospheric OClO data record produced in the framework of EUMETSAT’s Satellite Application Facility on Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring (AC SAF) using the GOME2-A and -B instruments over the 2007–2016 and 2013–2016 periods, respectively. OClO slant column densities are compared to correlative measurements collected from 9 NDACC Zenith-Scattered-Light DOAS (ZSL-DOAS) instruments distributed in both the Arctic and Antarctic. Sensitivity tests are performed on the ground-based data to estimate the impact of the different OClO DOAS analysis settings. On this basis, we infer systematic uncertainties of about 25 % between the different ground-based data analysis, reaching total uncertainties ranging from about 26 % to 33 % for the different stations. Time-series at the different sites show good agreement between satellite and ground-based data, both for the inter-annual variability and the overall OClO seasonal behavior. GOME-2A results are found to be nosier than those of GOME-2B, especially after 2011, probably due to instrumental degradation effects. Daily linear regression analysis for OClO activated periods yield correlation coefficients of 0.8 for GOME-2A and 0.87 for GOME-2B, with slopes of 0.64 and 0.72, respectively. Biases are within 8 x 1013 molec/cm2 with some differences between GOME-2A and GOME-2B, depending on the station. Overall, considering all the stations, a median bias of about −2.2 x 1013 molec/cm2 is found for both GOME-2 instruments.