Chemical shift reference scale for Li solid state NMR derived by 
first-principles DFT calculations

Köcher, S. S.; Schlecker, P. P. M.; Graf, M.F.; Eichel, R.-A.; Reuter, Karsten; Granwehr, J.; Scheurer, Ch.

doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2018.10.003

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

Chemical shift reference scale for Li solid state NMR derived by first-principles DFT calculations

MPS-Authors

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available

External Resource

There are no locators available

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

公開されているフルテキストはありません

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Köcher, S. S., Schlecker, P. P. M., Graf, M., Eichel, R.-A., Reuter, K., Granwehr, J., & Scheurer, C. (2018). Chemical shift reference scale for Li solid state NMR derived by first-principles DFT calculations. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 297, 33-41. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2018.10.003.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-7ED9-5

要旨

For studying electrode and electrolyte materials for lithium ion batteries, solid-state (SS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) of lithium moves into focus of current research. Theoretical simulations of magnetic resonance parameters facilitate the analysis and interpretation of experimental Li SS–NMR spectra and provide unique insight into physical and chemical processes that are determining the spectral profile. In the present paper, the accuracy and reliability of the theoretical simulation methods of Li chemical shielding values is benchmarked by establishing a reference scale for Li SS–NMR of diamagnetic compounds. The impact of geometry, ionic mobility and relativity are discussed. Eventually, the simulation methods are applied to the more complex lithium titanate spinel (Li₄Ti₅O₁₂, LTO), which is a widely discussed battery anode material. Simulation of the Li SS–NMR spectrum shows that the commonly adopted approach of assigning the resonances to individual crystallographic sites is not unambiguous.