English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Clinical, Brain, and Multilevel Clustering in Early Psychosis and Affective Stages

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons275218

Buciuman,  Madalina-Octavia
IMPRS Translational Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons273546

Sanfelici,  Rachele
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons262425

Popovic,  David
IMPRS Translational Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons262413

Oeztuerk,  Oemer Faruk
IMPRS Translational Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons261980

Koutsouleris,  Nikolaos
Max Planck Fellow Group Precision Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Dwyer, D. B., Buciuman, M.-O., Ruef, A., Kambeitz, J., Sen Dong, M., Stinson, C., et al. (2022). Clinical, Brain, and Multilevel Clustering in Early Psychosis and Affective Stages. JAMA PSYCHIATRY. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1163.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-A9D6-6
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Approaches are needed to stratify individuals in early psychosis stages beyond positive symptom severity to investigate specificity related to affective and normative variation and to validate solutions with premorbid, longitudinal, and genetic risk measures.
OBJECTIVE To use machine learning techniques to cluster, compare, and combine subgroup solutions using clinical and brain structural imaging data from early psychosis and depression stages.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A multisite, naturalistic, longitudinal cohort study (10 sites in 5 European countries; including major follow-up intervals at 9 and 18 months) with a referred patient sample of those with clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), recent-onset psychosis (ROP), recent-onset depression (ROD), and healthy controls were recruited between February 1, 2014, to July 1, 2019. Data were analyzed between January 2020 and January 2022.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES A nonnegative matrix factorization technique separately decomposed clinical (287 variables) and parcellated brain structural volume (204 gray, white, and cerebrospinal fluid regions) data across CHR-P, ROP, ROD, and healthy controls study groups. Stability criteria determined cluster number using nested cross-validation. Validation targets were compared across subgroup solutions (premorbid, longitudinal, and schizophrenia polygenic risk scores). Multiclass supervised machine learning produced a transferable solution to the validation sample.
RESULTS There were a total of 749 individuals in the discovery group and 610 individuals in the validation group. Individuals included those with CHR-P (n = 287), ROP (n = 323), ROD (n = 285), and healthy controls (n = 464), The mean (SD) age was 25.1 (5.9) years, and 702 (51.7%) were female. A clinical 4-dimensional solution separated individuals based on positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depression, and functioning, demonstrating associations with all validation targets. Brain clustering revealed a subgroup with distributed brain volume reductions associated with negative symptoms, reduced performance IQ, and increased schizophrenia polygenic risk scores. Multilevel results distinguished between normative and illness-related brain differences. Subgroup results were largely validated in the external sample.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this longitudinal cohort study provide stratifications beyond the expression of positive symptoms that cut across illness stages and diagnoses. Clinical results suggest the importance of negative symptoms, depression, and functioning. Brain results suggest substantial overlap across illness stages and normative variation, which may highlight a vulnerability signature independent from specific presentations. Premorbid, longitudinal, and genetic risk validation suggested clinical importance of the subgroups to preventive treatments.