English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Antibiotic treatment protocols revisited: the challenges of a conclusive assessment by mathematical modelling

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons214490

Uecker,  Hildegard
Research Group Stochastic Evolutionary Dynamics, Department Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

rsif.2021.0308(1).pdf
(Publisher version), 794KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Uecker, H., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2021). Antibiotic treatment protocols revisited: the challenges of a conclusive assessment by mathematical modelling. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 18(181): 20210308. doi:10.1098/rsif.2021.0308.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-A194-8
Abstract
Hospital-acquired bacterial infections lead to prolonged hospital stays and increased mortality. The problem is exacerbated by antibiotic-resistant strains that delay or impede effective treatment. To ensure successful therapy and to manage antibiotic resistance, treatment protocols that draw on several different antibiotics might be used. This includes the administration of drug cocktails to individual patients (combination therapy) but also the random assignment of drugs to different patients (mixing) and a regular switch in the default drug used in the hospital from drug A to drug B and back (cycling). For more than 20 years, mathematical models have been used to assess the prospects of antibiotic combination therapy, mixing and cycling. But while tendencies in their ranking across studies have emerged, the picture remains surprisingly inconclusive and incomplete. In this article, we review existing modelling studies and demonstrate by means of examples how methodological factors complicate the emergence of a consistent picture. These factors include the choice of the criterion by which the effects of the protocols are compared, the model implementation and its analysis. We thereafter discuss how progress can be made and suggest future modelling directions.