English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Whole-body sensorimotor skill learning in football players: No evidence for motor transfer effects

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons222543

Maudrich,  Tom
Department of Human Movement Neuroscience, Faculty of Sport Science, University of Leipzig, Germany;
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19935

Ragert,  Patrick
Department of Human Movement Neuroscience, Faculty of Sport Science, University of Leipzig, Germany;
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons222546

Kenville,  Rouven
Department of Human Movement Neuroscience, Faculty of Sport Science, University of Leipzig, Germany;
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Maudrich_2022.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Maudrich, T., Kandt, H., Ragert, P., & Kenville, R. (2022). Whole-body sensorimotor skill learning in football players: No evidence for motor transfer effects. PLoS One, 17(7): e0271412. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271412.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-B7EA-0
Abstract
Besides simple movement sequences, precise whole-body motor sequences are fundamental for top athletic performance. It has long been questioned whether athletes have an advantage when learning new whole-body motor sequences. In a previous study, we did not find any superior learning or transfer effects of strength and endurance athletes in a complex whole-body serial reaction time task (CWB-SRTT). In the present study, we aimed to extend this research by increasing the overlap of task requirements between CWB-SRTT and a specific sports discipline. For this purpose, we assessed differences between football players and non-athletes during motor sequence learning using CWB-SRTT. 15 non-athletes (CG) and 16 football players (FG) performed the CWB-SRTT over 2 days separated by one week. Median reaction times and movement times were analyzed as well as differences in sequence-specific CWB-SRTT learning rates and retention. Our findings did not reveal any differences in sequence-specific or non-sequence-specific improvement, nor retention rates between CG and FG. We speculate that this might relate to a predominately cognitive-induced learning effect during CWB-SRTT which negates the assumed motor advantage of the football players.