English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 PreviousNext  

Released

Journal Article

Multiple mechanisms mediate the suppression of motion vision during escape maneuvers in flying Drosophila

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons270745

Fischer,  Philippe       
Emmy Noether Group Neurobiology of Flight Control, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior – caesar, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons39057

Schnell,  Bettina       
Emmy Noether Group Neurobiology of Flight Control, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

1-s2.0-S2589004222014158-main.pdf
(Publisher version), 8MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Fischer, P., & Schnell, B. (2022). Multiple mechanisms mediate the suppression of motion vision during escape maneuvers in flying Drosophila. iScience, 25(10): 105143. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105143.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000B-2D8E-4
Abstract
During voluntary behaviors, animals need to disable any reflexes that could interfere with the intended movements. With the optomotor response, flies stabilize a straight flight path by correcting for unintended deviations sensed as the panoramic motion of the surround. HS cells of the fly are thought to mediate optomotor responses to horizontal motion. During spontaneous flight turns, an efference copy acts on HS cells with the right sign to counteract the visual input elicited by the fly’s own behavior. Here, we investigated, whether looming-elicited turns in flying Drosophila have a similar effect on HS cells. We show that looming stimuli themselves can influence the processing of panoramic motion stimuli in HS cells and that an inhibitory efference copy suppresses excitatory motion responses during turns in both directions, but only in a subset of HS cells. Our findings support the notion that the processing of sensory information is finely tuned to behavioral context.