English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Book Chapter

Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods

MPS-Authors

Bastos,  Ana
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons37296

Pongratz,  Julia       
Climate-Biogeosphere Interaction, The Ocean in the Earth System, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Poulter, B., Bastos, A., Canadell, J., Ciais, P., Huntzinger, D., Houghton, R., et al. (2022). Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods. In B. Poulter (Ed.), Balancing greenhouse gas budgets: (pp. 59-85). Amsterdam: Elsevier.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000B-21C6-0
Abstract
This chapter introduces greenhouse gas accounting activities that use “bottom-up” approaches. Bottom-up approaches can be categorized into inventory, bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven (i.e., remote sensing) methods. Activity data combined with emission factors, gain-loss, or stock-change analyses are the basis of each approach used to carry out the reporting and accounting. Uncertainties stem from data sources, model parameters, type of forcing, reporting level, and uncertainties between methods relate to definitions inherent to reporting requirements by the IPCC and UNFCCC. © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.