English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Computational theories of alcohol use disorder: Mapping learning and choice mechanisms on symptoms

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons104604

Deserno,  Lorenz       
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TU Dresden, Germany;
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany;
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Sebold, M., Kiebel, S. J., Smolka, M. N., Heinz, A., & Deserno, L. (2022). Computational theories of alcohol use disorder: Mapping learning and choice mechanisms on symptoms. Neuropsychobiology, 81(5), 339-356. doi:10.1159/000527146.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000B-5057-9
Abstract
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is characterized by a combination of symptoms including excessive craving, loss of control, and progressive neglect of alternative pleasures. A mechanistic understanding of what drives these symptoms is needed to improve diagnostic stratification and to develop new treatment and prevention strategies for AUD. To date, there is no consensus regarding a unifying mechanistic framework that accounts for the different symptoms of AUD. Reinforcement learning (RL) and economic choice theories may be key to elucidating the underlying processes of symptom development and maintenance in AUD. These algorithms may account for the different behavioral and physiological phenomena and are suited to dissect mechanisms linked to different symptoms of AUD. We here review different RL and economic choice models and how they map onto three symptoms of AUD: (1) cue-induced craving, (2) neglect of alternative rewards, and (3) consumption despite adverse consequences. For each symptom and theory, we describe findings from animal and human studies. In humans, we focus on empirical studies that investigated RL models in the context of treatment outcome in AUD. The review indicates important gaps to be addressed in the future by highlighting the challenges in transferring findings from RL and economic choice studies to clinical application. We also critically evaluate the potential and pitfalls of a symptom-oriented approach and highlight the importance of elucidating the role of learning and decision-making processes across diagnostic boundaries.