Sanction Severity Influences Learning About Enforcement Policy: Experimental 
Evidence

Friehe, Tim; Langenbach, Pascal; Mungan, Murat C.

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Sanction Severity Influences Learning About Enforcement Policy: Experimental Evidence

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons183155

Langenbach, Pascal
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4095660
(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Friehe, T., Langenbach, P., & Mungan, M. C. (in press). Sanction Severity Influences Learning About Enforcement Policy: Experimental Evidence. Journal of Legal Studies.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000B-5664-4

Abstract

The literature on law enforcement often assumes that the updating of beliefs regarding the probability of detection is a process that is independent from the severity of the sanction. We test this presumption experimentally, using a taking game in which the probability of detection may be either high or low according to commonly known priors. Individuals gain information regarding their detection probability from their detection experience in the taking game. Some offenders are punished by a severe sanction, while others are sanctioned only mildly, which causes the detection experience to differ across subjects. Our analysis reveals that the sanction severity influences how individuals update their beliefs about the detection probability, casting doubt on the widely-held presumption that the perceived detection probability and the sanction magnitude are separable.