English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Book Chapter

Group transformation: life history trade-offs, division of labor, and evolutionary transitions in individuality

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons250404

Doulcier,  Guilhem       
Department Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Doulcier, G., Hammerschmidt, K., & Bourrat, P. (2022). Group transformation: life history trade-offs, division of labor, and evolutionary transitions in individuality. In M. D. Herron, P. L. Conlin, & W. C. Ratcliff (Eds.), The Evolution of Multicellularity (1st, pp. 227-248). CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9780429351907-15.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000B-6E97-0
Abstract
Reproductive division of labor has been proposed to play a key role in evolutionary transitions in individuality (ETIs). This chapter provides a guide to a theoretical model that addresses the role of a trade-off between life history traits in selecting for a reproductive division of labor during the transition from unicellular to multicellular organisms. In particular, it focuses on the five key assumptions of the model: (1) fitness is viability times fecundity; (2) collective traits are linear functions of their cellular counterparts; (3) there is a trade-off between cell viability and fecundity; (4) cell contribution to the collective is optimal; and (5) there is an initial reproductive cost in large collectives. Thereafter, the chapter contrasts two interpretations of the model in the context of ETIs. Originally, the model was interpreted as showing that, during the transition to multicellularity, the fitness of the lower level (the cells) is “transferred” to the higher level (the collective). However, despite its apparent intuitiveness, fitness transfer may obscure actual mechanisms in metaphorical language. Therefore, this chapter advocates an alternative and more conservative interpretation of the model that focuses on cell traits and the evolutionary constraints that link them. In addition, it allows for pursuing subsequent questions, such as the evolution of development.