English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Gatekeeper's Potential Privilege – the Need to Limit DMA Centralisation

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons214880

Hoffmann,  Jörg
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons275393

Herrmann,  Liza
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons285454

Kestler,  Lukas
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Hoffmann, J., Herrmann, L., & Kestler, L. (2024). Gatekeeper's Potential Privilege – the Need to Limit DMA Centralisation. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 12(1), 126-147.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000C-52AF-3
Abstract
The Digital Markets Act (DMA) aims at promoting contestable and fair markets for core platform services by setting out obligations for designated gatekeepers. As the DMA does not clearly define these two objectives, it comes into conflict with national legislation with overlapping objectives. This may include unfair competition laws and sector-specific regulation. Art. 1(5) DMA addresses this conflict by stipulating that Member States may not impose further obligations on gatekeepers for the purpose of ensuring contestable and fair markets. The effect this has is that national provisions vis-à-vis gatekeepers may not be applicable anymore and competences are centralised on the European level more broadly than potentially envisaged by the European legislature. This centralisation of competences runs the risk of inadvertently privileging gatekeepers by blocking national laws that are, however, still applicable to SMEs and other firms competing with gatekeepers. This paper suggests solutions to mitigate such risk.