English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner's guide

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons239911

Govaart,  Gisela       
Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin (ECN), Germany;
Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Jamieson_2023.pdf
(Publisher version), 372KB

Supplementary Material (public)

Jamieson_2023_Suppl.docx
(Supplementary material), 11KB

Jamieson_2023_Suppl1.docx
(Supplementary material), 11KB

Citation

Jamieson, M. K., Govaart, G., & Pownall, M. (2023). Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner's guide. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(4): e12735. doi:10.1111/spc3.12735.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000C-8EE3-4
Abstract
Reflexivity is the act of examining one's own assumption, belief, and judgement systems, and thinking carefully and critically about how these influence the research process. The practice of reflexivity confronts and questions who we are as researchers and how this guides our work. It is central in debates on objectivity, subjectivity, and the very foundations of social science research and generated knowledge. Incorporating reflexivity in the research process is traditionally recognized as one of the most notable differences between qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Qualitative research centres and celebrates the participants' personal and unique lived experience. Therefore, qualitative researchers are readily encouraged to consider how their own unique positionalities inform the research process and this forms an important part of training within this paradigm. Quantitative methodologies in social and personality psychology, and more generally, on the other hand, have remained seemingly detached from this level of reflexivity and general reflective practice. In this commentary, we, three quantitative researchers who have grappled with the compatibility of reflexivity within our own research, argue that reflexivity has much to offer quantitative methodologists. The act of reflexivity prompts researchers to acknowledge and centre their own positionalities, encourages a more thoughtful engagement with every step of the research process, and thus, as we argue, contributes to the ongoing reappraisal of openness and transparency in psychology. In this paper, we make the case for integrating reflexivity across all research approaches, before providing a ‘beginner's guide’ for quantitative researchers wishing to engage reflexively with their own work, providing concrete recommendations, worked examples, and reflexive prompts.