English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Comparison of EPI DWI and STEAM DWI in Early Postoperative MRI Controls After Resection of Tumors of the Central Nervous System

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons15968

Voit,  Dirk
Research Group Biomedical NMR, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons15082

Frahm,  Jens
Research Group Biomedical NMR, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

s00062-023-01261-7.pdf
(Postprint), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Müller, S. J., Khadhraoui, E., Voit, D., Riedel, C. H., Frahm, J., Romero, J. M., et al. (2023). Comparison of EPI DWI and STEAM DWI in Early Postoperative MRI Controls After Resection of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. Clinical Neuroradiology, 33, 677-685. doi:10.1007/s00062-023-01261-7.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000C-B377-4
Abstract
Purpose:
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is important for differentiating residual tumor and subacute infarctions in early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. In cases of pneumocephalus and especially in the presence of intraventricular trapped air, conventional echo-planar imaging (EPI) DWI is distorted by susceptibility artifacts. The performance and robustness of a newly developed DWI sequence using the stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) was evaluated in patients after neurosurgical operations with early postoperative MRI.

Methods:
We compared EPI and STEAM DWI of 43 patients who received 3‑Tesla MRI within 72 h after a neurosurgical operation between 1 October 2019 and 30 September 2021. We analyzed susceptibility artifacts originating from air and blood and whether these artifacts compromised the detection of ischemic changes after surgery. The DWI sequences were (i) visually rated and (ii) volumetrically analyzed.

Results:
In 28 of 43 patients, we found severe and diagnostically relevant artifacts in EPI DWI, but none in STEAM DWI. In these cases, in which artifacts were caused by intracranial air, they led to a worse detection of ischemic lesions and thus to a possible failed diagnosis or lack of judgment using EPI DWI. Additionally, volumetric analysis demonstrated a 14% smaller infarct volume detected with EPI DWI. No significant differences in visual rating and volumetric analysis were detected among the patients without severe artifacts.

Conclusion:
The newly developed version of STEAM DWI with highly undersampled radial encodings is superior to EPI DWI in patients with postoperative pneumocephalus.