English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Characterizing the nucleus of comet 162P/Siding Spring using ground-based photometry

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons104074

Masoumzadeh,  N.
Planetary Science Department, Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Donaldson, A., Rożek, A., Gardener, D., Green, S. F., Masoumzadeh, N., & Robinson, J. (2023). Characterizing the nucleus of comet 162P/Siding Spring using ground-based photometry. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad616.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000C-B652-A
Abstract
Comet 162P/Siding Spring is a large Jupiter-family comet with extensive archival lightcurve data. We report new r-band nucleus lightcurves for this comet, acquired in 2018, 2021 and 2022. With the addition of these lightcurves, the phase angles at which the nucleus has been observed range from 0.39 to 16.33. We absolutely-calibrate the comet lightcurves to r-band Pan-STARRS 1 magnitudes, and use these lightcurves to create a convex shape model of the nucleus by convex lightcurve inversion. The best-fitting shape model for 162P has axis ratios a/b = 1.56 and b/c = 2.33, sidereal period P = 32.864 ± 0.001 h, and a rotation pole oriented towards eclipitic longitude λE = 118 ± 26 and latitude βE = -50 ± 21. We constrain the possible nucleus elongation to lie within 1.4 < a/b < 2.0 and discuss tentative evidence that 162P may have a bilobed structure. Using the shape model to correct the lightcurves for rotational effects, we derive a linear phase function with slope β = 0.051 ± 0.002 mag deg-1 and intercept Hr(1, 1, 0) = 13.86 ± 0.02 for 162P. We find no evidence that the nucleus exhibited an opposition surge at phase angles down to 0.39°. The challenges associated with modelling the shapes of comet nuclei from lightcurves are highlighted, and we comment on the extent to which we anticipate that LSST will alleviate these challenges in the coming decade.