English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Opinion

Revisiting the Framework for Compulsory Licensing of Patents in the European Union

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons51216

Lamping,  Matthias
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons79145

Batista,  Pedro Henrique D.
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons249375

Correa,  Juan I.
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons51199

Hilty,  Reto M.
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons205923

Kim,  Daria
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons201976

Slowinski,  Peter R.
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons273867

Steinhart,  Miriam
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lamping, M., Batista, P. H. D., Correa, J. I., Hilty, R. M., Kim, D., Slowinski, P. R., et al. (2023). Revisiting the Framework for Compulsory Licensing of Patents in the European Union.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000C-E6CF-8
Abstract
Within the scope of its initiative on “Compulsory Licensing in the EU”, the European Commission launched a call for evidence on 1 April 2022 and a public consultation on 7 July 2022 with the aim of gathering views from stakeholders. The objective of this initiative is to explore the possibility of revising the framework for compulsory licensing in the EU to make it more “adequately prepared and coordinated to tackle future crises”. The authors of this position paper welcome the Commission’s attempt to reinvigorate the public discourse on this important subject. This paper addresses selected aspects by way of a preliminary, non-exhaustive note on: the proposed reform’s scope and the grounds for a compulsory licence; the requirements of prior negotiation and licensing failure; government use; procedural matters; compulsory licences for patent applications and products; the relation with other regulations and sui generis regimes (i.e. trade secret protection, regulatory data protection, and supplementary protection certificates); the concept of adequate remuneration; compulsory licences for European patents with unitary effect; and the exhaustion of products placed on the market under a compulsory licence.