English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Shaping Public Perception: Polish Illustrated Press and the Image of Polish Naturalists Working in Latin America, 1844–1885

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons282176

Kaye,  Aleksandra
Department Structural Changes in Systems of Knowledge, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Kaye, A. (2023). Shaping Public Perception: Polish Illustrated Press and the Image of Polish Naturalists Working in Latin America, 1844–1885. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 46(2-3), 158-180. doi:10.1002/bewi.202200047.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-0E07-D
Abstract
This article will investigate the ways in which Polish illustrated press contributed to communicating and reporting the work of Polish
émigré naturalists working in Latin America to the Polish general public living in the Prussian, Russian and Austrian partitions of the Polish-
Lithuanian Commonwealth 1844–1885. It examines the ways in which illustrations were used to shape the public’s opinion about the significance of these migrants’ scientific achievements. The Polish illustrated press, its authors and editors were instrumental in shaping the public’s perceptions of the reach of Polish scientists, and exploring their impact on broader scientific debates, thereby situating Polish people and their work in a global context. The didactic and opinion-making role of the illustrated press was highly influential among Polish audiences during this period, at a time when the survival of Polish identity, culture, language, and education was uncertain. Illustrated weeklies were one of
the vectors through which high science was made accessible to the Polish public. A study of pictures in Polish illustrated press will help to
explain how they contributed towards shaping the images in the public eye of naturalists’ scientific work, and discourses about science and its actors more broadly.