Validate your CEST simulation!

Schuenke, P; Herz, K; Zu, Z; Yadav, N; Zheng, Q; Huemer, M; Stollberger, R; Xu, J; Wang, K; Romdhane, F; Longo, DL; Perlman, O; van Zijl, PCM; Zaiss, M

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Meeting Abstract

Validate your CEST simulation!

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons216025

Herz, K
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://submissions.mirasmart.com/ISMRM2023/Itinerary/ConferenceMatrixEventDetail.aspx?id=141
(Abstract)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Schuenke, P., Herz, K., Zu, Z., Yadav, N., Zheng, Q., Huemer, M., et al. (2023). Validate your CEST simulation! In 2023 ISMRM & ISMRT Annual Meeting & Exhibition (ISMRM 2023).

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-3818-A

Abstract

Quantitative CEST approaches can provide access to the exchange rate and solute concentration of exchange processes of interest. However, differences in the implementation of underlying Bloch-McConnell simulations will lead to differences in the determined quantitative parameters. Thus, we initiated a platform to compare and validate the CEST simulations from various CEST research groups. In this first comparison of continuous-wave saturation schemes, up to 5 different results for 8 compared simulations were observed. The project is still open for participation and we invite everbody to join the comparison and our planned discussions to finally realize a consensus on CEST simulations.