Can Data Protection Friendly Conduct Constitute an Abuse of Dominance under 
Art. 102 TFEU?

Wiedemann, Klaus

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Paper

Can Data Protection Friendly Conduct Constitute an Abuse of Dominance under Art. 102 TFEU?

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons197888

Wiedemann, Klaus
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://ssrn.com/abstract=4520608
(Preprint)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Wiedemann, K. (2023). Can Data Protection Friendly Conduct Constitute an Abuse of Dominance under Art. 102 TFEU? Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 23-15.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-7C98-D

Abstract

This chapter analyses whether data protection friendly conduct can infringe Art. 102 TFEU. Despite their differences, both legal regimes share at least three objectives, inter alia protection of competition. This allows for a holistic approach, taking into account competition policy and data protection considerations. The paper argues that the key question is which economic effects a specific conduct has. One must differentiate three scenarios accordingly. The first scenario is that data protection friendly conduct has pro-competitive (or neutral) effects. In such cases, an abuse of dominance is precluded. The second is that conduct is strictly mandated by data protection law. To the extent that a company has no choice but to follow the data protection regulation it cannot be blamed for anti-competitive effects of this conduct. The third scenario is that a market-dominant company invokes data protection as a justification for anti-competitive conduct. Here, a careful proportionality test is necessary.