English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Contribution to Collected Edition

Precarious companionship: Discourses of adversity and commonality in Jewish-Muslim dialogue initiatives in Germany.

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons289196

Peretz,  Dekel       
Socio-Cultural Diversity, MPI for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://brill.com/display/book/9789004514331/BP000006.xml
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

OA_Peretz_2022_Precarious.pdf
(Publisher version), 793KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Nagel, A.-K., & Peretz, D. (2022). Precarious companionship: Discourses of adversity and commonality in Jewish-Muslim dialogue initiatives in Germany. In S. S. Everett, & B. Gidley (Eds.), Jews and Muslims in Europe: between discourse and experience (pp. 99-119). Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004514331_006.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-C1E4-7
Abstract
Muslims and Jews are an integral part of interreligious activism in Germany. They share a stricter notion of monotheism as compared to Christians. Local Jewish-Muslim dialogue takes place in the shadow of the Middle East conflict as well as radical Islamic terror attacks, and both pursue similar interests, i.e. regarding circumcision and halal or kosher butchering. We explore how the multi-layered setting shapes Jewish-Muslim encounters within interreligious initiatives in Germany. We analyse discourses in two spheres of interreligious dialogue. The first is local in-person dialogue initiatives that took place in the years 2011/12 during the circumcision debate. The second is translocal dialogue activities presented in social media that took place in 2020 when dialogue had moved to digital frameworks and social media due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The focal point of our comparative analysis is the discourses of adversity and commonality shaping these conversations and the narratives of difference and unity they produce.