English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Negativity bias in the spread of voter fraud conspiracy theory tweets during the 2020 US election

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons268807

Youngblood,  Mason
The MINT independent research group, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons189367

Morin,  Olivier       
The MINT independent research group, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

gea0115.pdf
(Publisher version), 849KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Youngblood, M., Stubbersfield, J. M., Morin, O., Glassman, R., & Acerbi, A. (2023). Negativity bias in the spread of voter fraud conspiracy theory tweets during the 2020 US election. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1): 573. doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02106-x.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-C82C-1
Abstract
During the 2020 US presidential election, conspiracy theories about large-scale voter fraud were widely circulated on social media platforms. Given their scale, persistence, and impact, it is critically important to understand the mechanisms that caused these theories to spread. The aim of this preregistered study was to investigate whether retweet frequencies among proponents of voter fraud conspiracy theories on Twitter during the 2020 US election are consistent with frequency bias and/or content bias. To do this, we conducted generative inference using an agent-based model of cultural transmission on Twitter and the VoterFraud2020 dataset. The results show that the observed retweet distribution is consistent with a strong content bias causing users to preferentially retweet tweets with negative emotional valence. Frequency information appears to be largely irrelevant to future retweet count. Follower count strongly predicts retweet count in a simpler linear model but does not appear to drive the overall retweet distribution after temporal dynamics are accounted for. Future studies could apply our methodology in a comparative framework to assess whether content bias for emotional valence in conspiracy theory messages differs from other forms of information on social media.