English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Networked statehood: an institutionalised self-contradiction in the process of globalisation?

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons239463

Golia,  Angelo Jr
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Golia, A. J., & Teubner, G. (2021). Networked statehood: an institutionalised self-contradiction in the process of globalisation? Transnational Legal Theory, 12(1), 7-43. doi:10.1080/20414005.2021.1927608.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-CDC2-1
Abstract
World economy and world science have not yet found a counterpart in a world state and probably never will. However, the contours of a political system have emerged, which fulfil the functions of statehood at the global level. Such a system does not take the form of a uniform corporative-hierarchical collectivity but of networked statehood, ie a network of individual states, international organisations, and transnational regimes. Relying on social science and legal constructions, this article offers a positive and negative definition of this concept and an analysis of its intrinsically self-contradictory character traits. Despite these unavoidable contradictions, this article argues that networked statehood still provides considerable advantages and outlines general principles of a future law of networked statehood. These outlines are founded on the belief that networked statehood must be seen as a new and distinct legal form of action but likewise facing the problem of democratic legitimacy.