Datensatz

Zusammenfassung

The importance of spatial scale for b-diversity has been shown in several studies, but it is unclear how
spatial diversity patterns correlate among different organismic groups. We studied spatial diversity organization
of plants and several trophic guilds of beetles in beech-dominated forests in two regions of Germany
to test whether different trophic guilds are organized independently in space. We applied
multiplicative diversity partitioning using a nested hierarchical design of four increasingly broader spatial
levels (subplot, plot, forest class, region) and tested for correlations among trophic guilds by using
Pearson product moment correlations and Mantel-tests. We observed similar general diversity patterns
at different trophic guilds showing a high contribution of b-diversity to total c-diversity and found
b-diversity to be higher at different spatial scales and a-diversity to be lower than expected by random
distributions of individuals. Results, however, partly depended on the weighting of rare and abundant
species. Beta-diversity in our study was caused mainly by species spatial turnover rather than by nestedness.
Correlations of a-diversity between trophic guilds were low whereas correlations of b-diversity
above subplot level were high. Importantly, more strongly connected trophic guilds revealed not generally
stronger relationships than less strongly connected guilds. Three important implications for conservation
can be deduced from our results: (1) heterogeneity of beech forests at different spatial scales
should be supported in conservation strategies to enhance biodiversity and related functions; (2) the
observed high importance of spatial turnover in relation to nestedness implies a concentration of conservation
efforts to a large number of not necessarily the richest sites, and (3) recommendation for particular
conservation strategies (e.g. selection of priority sites for conservation at regional scale) based on single
indicator taxa or functional guild is difficult because of the varied response of the species in our study.