ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the 
non-visual effects of light in humans

Spitschan, M; Kervezee, L; Lok, R; McGlashan, E; Najjar, RP; ENLIGHT Consortium,

doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104889

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humans

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons268323

Spitschan, M
Research Group Translational Sensory and Circadian Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396423004553
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Spitschan, M., Kervezee, L., Lok, R., McGlashan, E., Najjar, R., & ENLIGHT Consortium (2023). ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humans. EBioMedicine, 98: 104889. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104889.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000E-00F5-D

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus on reporting light characteristics in studies investigating non-visual responses to light. This project aimed to develop a reporting checklist for laboratory-based investigations on the impact of light on non-visual physiology.
Methods: A four-step modified Delphi process (three questionnaire-based feedback rounds and one face-to-face group discussion) involving international experts was conducted to reach consensus on the items to be included in the checklist. Following the consensus process, the resulting checklist was tested in a pilot phase with independent experts.
Findings: An initial list of 61 items related to reporting light-based interventions was condensed to a final checklist containing 25 items, based upon consensus among experts (final n = 60). Nine items were deemed necessary to report regardless of research question or context. A description of each item is provided in the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. The independent pilot testing phase led to minor textual clarifications in the checklist and E&E document.
Interpretation: The ENLIGHT Checklist is the first consensus-based checklist for documenting and reporting ocular light-based interventions for human studies. The implementation of the checklist will enhance the impact of light-based research by ensuring comprehensive documentation, enhancing reproducibility, and enabling data aggregation across studies.