Item

Abstract

It is tempting to map interindividual variability in human perception to variability in brain structure or neural activity. Indeed, it has been shown that susceptibility to size illusions correlates with the size of primary visual cortex V1. Yet contrary to common belief, illusions correlate only weakly at the perceptual level, raising the question of how they can correlate with a localized neural measure. In addition, mounting evidence suggests that there is substantial interindividual variability not only in neural function and anatomy but also in the mapping between the two, which further challenges the findings of a neural common factor for illusions. To better understand these questions, here, we re-evaluated previous studies by correlating illusion strengths in a battery of 13 illusions with the size of visual areas and population receptive field sizes. We did not find significant correlations either at the perceptual level or between illusion susceptibility and visual functional neuroanatomy.